I was so excited to get my October edition of Texas Monthly, as I am every month. I'm so glad I subscribed to it, especially since it's only $12 a month. Now, the magazine can be a little on the liberal side at times, but you learn to filter. Overall, it's a great magazine.
However, in the October edition I read an article on the State Board of Education, which chooses our states curriculum guidelines (and determines what I teach). But the article isn't about the process or even the under-qualification of the members, it's about...well, why don't you read it for yourself.
Maybe you came to the same conclusion I did about it, or maybe you really liked it, or maybe you could care less. The article left a bad taste in my mouth and got me all riled up :-) So, I decided to relay my thoughts to Texas Monthly. Here they are:

I was very intrigued when I saw the article on the State Board of Education,
seeing that I'm a sixth grade science department chair in Houston. I thought
staging the article as a TAKS test was very clever. Probably every teacher,
administrator & school district has issues with
the TEKS. However, I did
not appreciate some of these "questions". It seems as though the author has
something against conservatives who believe in Intelligent Design, the virgin
birth, and homeschooling their children. I'll tell you what, I'm not dead set
on sending my (future) children to a public school. If everyone on the board
did send their kids to public school, they might not appreciate the
perspectives of alternatives or competition.
Also, the shots made
against Intelligent Design are just low. In question 11, the answer is
"evolution is both a fact and a theory." I know Ms. Vine is quoting the NAS,
but please explain to me how something can be a theory and a fact. The
textbook that I teach out of would have a hard time reconciling those two
things as being equal. And, yes, I do think that all of the things mentioned
in question 12 are theories that have strengths and weaknesses. I think there
are things we will never be able to explain.
As for the basis of the
article, sure, many people do not understand how the curriculum standards are
set, and I have my own qualms with the Board. But, this article makes me feel
as a teacher, that what I do isn't valued. And, as a conservative, I feel
personally attacked form this article trying to make a mockery out of people
with similar beliefs. I'm sure everyone, liberal or conservative, minority
or majority, could have been painted in the same light, but here it
was done on the basis of belief and not on the lack of qualification
(which is much more substantial).
I thought about canceling my
subscription over this article, but decided against it because of the great
articles I do get to read, like the one on the State School for the Blind
(great article!)
Recent Comments